The Wells Fargo/Gallup Investor and Retirement Optimism index, for instance, still remains at a lower level than it was before the start of the global financial crisis began in 2007. Russian shares fared even worse, meanwhile, losing more than a third of their value over the course of Obama's two terms.ĭespite the strong gains in the stock market, investors' enthusiasm has consistently been tepid throughout the Obama years. A big reason for that poor performance: Despite China's rapidly expanding economy, that country's equities gained only about a third as much as American equities. By comparison, shares of companies based in Europe, Japan, and other developed economies gained just 96% in total, according to the investment research firm Morningstar.Īnd overseas equities based in emerging economies like China and India fared only slightly better, posting gains of 110% over the past eight years - still less than half what U.S. stocks more than tripled investors' money, generating total returns (which include the value of reinvested dividends) of 235%. stocks far outperformed other global markets. While interest rates have been at record lows around the world, the fact remains that U.S. Investors who were earning virtually nothing by parking their money in cash or government bonds were forced to plow their money into equities to generate any return to speak of - and that gave the markets a lift. That unprecedented policy, which was enacted to prevent the economy from slipping into a deflationary spiral in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, was designed to promote risk taking in the economy. The Fed, in fact, only lifted rates two times - for a total of half a percentage point - near the end of the Obama administration.
The 44th president of the United States got a huge assist from the Federal Reserve, which took the unusual position of keeping short-term interest rates near zero for almost the entire duration of Obama's two terms. Many market observers have pointed out that the stock market's run under Obama may not have been all or even mostly Obama's doing. How is that possible? Unlike Reagan, who not only presided over a major bull market but also a couple of big stock slides - the 1981-82 downturn and the October 1987 crash - Obama's entire presidency unfolded in a bull market. The stock market's performance in the two terms under Obama represents "the second best run under a Democrat president," trailing only the 14.9% annual gains under Bill Clinton in the 1990s, according to Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist for the market research firm CFRA.Īmong all presidents, the market's annualized gain under Obama ranks third behind Clinton and Gerald Ford - although Ford presided over less than a single term.Įquities also gained nearly three percentage points more annually under Obama than under Ronald Reagan - who, along with Clinton, is widely perceived as having been history's biggest benefactors to Wall Street. Here's one other way to think about it: If during the upcoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump, the stock market were to replicate the success it enjoyed under Obama, rising by a factor of 2.5, then the Dow Jones industrial average - which currently stands at just under the 20,000 level - would have to climb all the way up to 50,000. stocks under the eight years of Obama's predecessor, President George W. They also compare favorably to the 4.6% annual losses suffered by the S&P 500 index of U.S. To put that in perspective, those price gains were nearly four percentage points per year more than domestic equities have averaged since the end of World War II. equities have surged 12% a year, not counting dividends, in what turned out to be the second-longest bull market in history. While the economic recovery under President Obama has been sluggish and underwhelming, slow and disappointing are hardly words you would use to describe the stock market's performance under the outgoing president.